top of page

Digital Literacies Artifact #1: Printing in Digital Photography

 

Course:   Technology and the Curriculum              

Date:         Spring 2011            Instructor:     Dr Janette Hughes

 

About the artifact:

 

This artifact addresses the question of photo prints in digital photography. It explores the use of photo sharing mind tools to meet the needs of 21st century learners. Furthermore, it evaluates the curriculum connection these tools have as well as the new skills these tools provide students with. The original format of this artifact is a powerpoint. However, it has been converted to a video for easier web sharing.

 

 

 

Reflection

 

This artifact was created in my very first M.Ed course. Amazingly, this course and this artifact continues to inform my teaching practice. I started this project as a project for a course, but it ended up being one of the most important pieces of work I created. This is because I asked myself a very specific question: Do we need a print in digital photography? This artifact was directly linked to my classroom practices. In completing this task I examined my current educational practices in my digital photography class. At the time it was the first year I had taught the course. I am the course creator and it has been a process of constant reinvention. As a direct result of creating this artifact I changed my course and modified my plans for the grade 12 course. This artifact forced me to critically analyse my motivations as an educator and critically evaluate the skills I was truly teaching and evaluating.

 

Interesting, my final course in my M.Ed was Digital Literacies, also with Dr. Hughes. As my final project in that course I implemented Twitter into my digital photography class (artifact 4 in digital literacies). When I created that artifact I had completely forgotten about this project. The learning from this artifact was so authentic for me it has become embedded in my practice. For me, this portfolio was a good opportunity to revisit this tool from three years ago. I was reminded of some great ideas I had that I can now actually implement. Change is often slow. After I created this artifact I had to wait until I taught the course again. I took out the print requirement. I started doing critiques using the LCD projector. I realized that the projector, as well as our screen sharing program, also diminished the photographic quality. Consequently, some feedback students received during critique was not useful or relevant. Students would give feedback on colour choice, but then if they looked to the image on screen it actually met with their suggestion, the method of sharing was just changing the quality. I tried the online Moodle forum, but students often loaded photos that were so large it was not possible to view on one screen. In removing the print I faced new challenges. However, I started asking my students to help me solve the problems.

 

My grade 11s, who were the subjects in this artifact became my grade 12s. In that course they learned to watermark their images and create their own digital portfolios, whereas I decided to keep the print portfolio as the grade 11 ISU. I felt it added this feeling of “specialness”. One of my ideas that emerged from the artifact was to use course money to print. I started doing that. I would put photographs up in the display cases with little stickers that said “Best Use of Colour”, “Most Interesting Composition”. It was fun because it became my own way of rewarding and celebrating great work, but it really motivated my students. They wanted to see their photo printed. They started coming over to help me put up prints just so they got the first look at who the project awards went to. After a year of maternity leave I returned to school to discover that my PC lab had become a MAC lab. Amazing. Terrifying. I knew how to work my PC lab in a way that helped the students. I had taught 5 rounds of photography and sorted the bugs out….now I felt I was back at sqare one. I started making enquiries and getting students involved. I still had the same projector problem. One solution arose during my grade 12 digital portfolio critiques. Previously, I could lock students’ screens so that they could not use the computers during critique. However, I had asked my 12s to post their portfolio links on our class 

Moodle. I looked around and half of my class was looking at their own screen, not the projector. I was annoyed…then I realized they had actually opened the student’s portfolio who was presenting and were following along on their screen. Brilliant! I started instructing them to do so. It was helpful to have the projector up so the student felt the formality of the presentation, but the feedback was so much better because the image quality was better. Students were zooming in on their own screen, making comparisons. Our level of critique increased. When I started the new grade 11 course this semester I started asking for 2 separate files. I created one folder for jpg images that I then could share to the students. That way they could see their peers work better.

 

 

Screen shot of a Grade 12 ISU project displayed on her website. 

When I wrote this artifact my Mind Tool was a photo sharing site. I listed Facebook, Tumblr, Photobucket and Voice Thread. No Twitter. No Instagram. However, these two tools would fall under the same mind tool category. Finally, after working out my in class sharing bugs I started getting students to share more publically. This is artifact 4 in this section; using Twitter. That artifact could not have come in to play had I not created this project. It was the seed, the foundation. It was the push I needed to shift my course into an immersive digital environment.

 

In revisiting this artifact I can see that it not only represents the concept of digital literacies in content, but also in its format. I created a multimodal presentation, it its PowerPoint format, that allows the reader to navigate in a non-linear way. It is almost like a website. I used hyperlinks within the document and to web spaces as well. I also added on my narration. This was the first time I had ever created a multimodal presentation. The artifact is a presentation but it can function without my presence. The presentation is no longer temporal because I added the oral dictation. It is a great snapshot of where I was at when I created this. I loved the final product so much that I actually did other presentations in this format throughout the program. For me, I am able to draw on my design strengths, writing abilities and verbal expressiveness. I have even started encouraging my students to created autonomous presentations that function without them, breaking the boundaries of time.

 

Thematic Connections

 

Finally, this tool reflects the nature of my Master's learning because it is interconnected with my other themes. This artifact shows educational leadership because in it I propose a new way to do something traditional. I call into question my own practices and, using relevant research, give convincing arguments for change. It has, consequently, put me in a leadership role in my school and my students have been empowered to lead as well as they take learning from my class into other areas of their lives. Recently, I was asked to share my practices in my digital photography classroom as an exemplar for staff on how effective and influential student feedback can be. I am proud to say that my peers were really impressed with how articulate and comfortable my students were at giving and receiving feedback and how wonderful their work was that was created digitally. I think, as a result, some of them will modify their practices. While the topic was different (self and peer assessment), the vehicle for that assessment was this digital sharing that emerged out of this artifact. Additionally, I think through this artifact social and cultural contexts have been examined. In the content of the work I explored the way in which my students currently share photographs. I considered their digital culture, their norms of practice, as well as the challenges of that culture. I employed this information into my design and used it to inform my choices in terms of delivery, tools, and potential pitfalls.

 

I am certainly not done employing change in my photography class. Even after reviewing this artifact I am reminded of things I want and need to do. Next year my grade 12s are going to start building their digital portfolio from the start of the semester. All my classes are going to be sharing weekly images on Twitter and Instagram, which will be linked on their portfolio. I am even considering leaving our board site (moodle) and creating a website that can link to all of my students (past and present). I plan on connecting more to our school community, parent community and global community. My numbers are down for next year, I have been exploring the reasons for that. Perhaps there was a disconnect with those who taught while I was on maternity leave and the way I teach. Perhaps students aren’t prepared for how much work photography truly is. My students that stuck out the year can’t understand why their peers did not. I think one thing I need to start doing is promoting the course and celebrating their work in a way that is more widely viewed and valued.

bottom of page